Traumatic versus Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Complications and Functional Outcomes in an Acute Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospital
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.502Keywords:
Inpatients, Physical Therapy Department, Hospital, Recovery of Function, Rehabilitation Centers, Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitationAbstract
Introduction: This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare demographic differences, functional outcomes, duration of stay (DOS), and complication profiles between patients with traumatic (TSCI) and non-traumatic (NTSCI) spinal cord injuries in an acute inpatient rehabilitation service.Methods: This study included 128 spinal cord injury patients, 68 with traumatic and 60 with nontraumatic lesions, admitted to the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation service of Hospital de Braga between January 2017 and December 2022. Parameters included demographics, injury causes, neurological levels, ASIA impairment scales, functional scores (FIM and SCIM), DOS, complications, discharge destination, bladder management, and ambulation level.
Results: NTSCI patients were older (mean 64 vs 59 years, p=0.074) and predominantly female (45% vs 16.2%, p=0.000). TSCI was primarily caused by falls (66.2%), while NTSCI stemmed from degenerative diseases (50%). TSCI patients had significantly longer DOS (mean 65.07 vs 45.78 days, p=0.021) and were admitted later post-injury (mean 51.61 vs 26.77 days, p=0.001). NTSCI patients had more paraplegia (61.7%) and incomplete injuries, while TSCI showed higher rates of tetraplegia (72.1%) and complete injuries (AIS A, 27.7% vs 7.3%, p=0.010). TSCI patients experienced more complications (mean 2.0 vs 1.4 per patient), including higher rates of pressure ulcers and depressive symptoms (p<0.05). Functional outcomes at discharge (FIM and SCIM scores) were lower in TSCI but demonstrated significant intra-group improvements, with no intergroup differences in functional gains. NTSCI patients were more likely to be discharged home, walk with assistive devices, and manage bladder function, while TSCI patients frequently required wheelchairs and indwelling catheters.
Conclusion: NTSCI patients were older, hospitalized earlier, had shorter rehabilitation DOS, fewer complications, and better functional status at admission than TSCI patients. Despite more severe impairments, TSCI patients achieved comparable functional gains during rehabilitation, emphasizing the need for tailored management strategies to address their higher complication rates and disability levels.
Downloads
References
Gedde MH, Lilleberg HS, Aßmus J, Gilhus NE, Rekand T. Traumatic vs non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A comparison of primary rehabilitation outcomes and complications during hospitalization. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;42:695-701. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1598698.
Cosar SN, Yemisci OU, Oztop P, Cetin N, Sarifakioglu B, Yalbuzdag SA, et al. Demographic characteristics after traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective comparison study. Spinal Cord. 2010;48:862-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.49.
Gupta A, Taly AB, Srivastava A, Murali T. Non-traumatic spinal cord lesions: epidemiology, complications, neurological and functional outcome of rehabilitation. Spinal Cord. 2009;47:307-11. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.123.
McKinley WO, Seel RT, Gadi RK, Tewksbury MA. Nontraumatic vs. traumatic spinal cord injury: a rehabilitation outcome comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:693-9; quiz 700, 716. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200109000-00010.
Khadour FA, Khadour YA, Meng L, Lixin C, Xu T. Epidemiological features of traumatic spinal cord injury in Wuhan, China. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023;18:72. doi:10.1186/s13018-023-03554-6
New PW, Simmonds F, Stevermuer T. A population-based study comparing traumatic spinal cord injury and non-traumatic spinal cord injury using a national rehabilitation database. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:397-403. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.77.
Ones K, Yilmaz E, Beydogan A, Gultekin O, Caglar N. Comparison of functional results in non-traumatic and traumatic spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1185-91. doi: 10.1080/09638280600902661.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista da Sociedade Portuguesa de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright statement
Authors must also submit a copyright statement (as seen below) on article submission.
To the Editor-in-chief of the SPMFR Journal:
The below signed author(s) hereby state that the article
________________________________________ (ref. MFR_________) is
an original unpublished work and all facts stated are a product of the author(s) investigation. This article does not violate any copyright laws or privacy statements. The author(s) also hereby confirm that there is no conflict of interest's issues in this article.
By submitting this article the author(s) agree that after publication all copyrights belong to the SPMFR Journal.
Signed by all authors
Date:
Names (capital letters):
Signatures:
The SPMFR Journal’s contents are follow a Creative Commons licence. After publication the authors can hand out the articles as long as the SPMFR Journal is credited.