Effects of an Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Walking and Mobility After Stroke: a Clinical Trial

Authors

  • Ana Margarida Ferreira Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação da Região Centro – Rovisco Pais
  • Jennifer Pires Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação da Região Centro – Rovisco Pais
  • Filipe Carvalho Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação da Região Centro – Rovisco Pais
  • Anabela Pereira Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação da Região Centro – Rovisco Pais
  • Inês Campos Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação da Região Centro – Rovisco Pais
  • Jorge Laíns Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação da Região Centro – Rovisco Pais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.240

Keywords:

Ankle, Foot Orthoses, Motor Skills, Orthotic Devices, Recovery of Function, Stroke/complications, Stroke Rehabilitation, Walking

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the present study was to analyze the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on walking and mobility of stroke patients with equinus and/or varus foot.

Material and Methods: Nineteen subacute/chronic stroke patients with equinus and/or varus foot which were able to walk without assistance were assessed with and without an ankle-foot orthosis. Physical performance was tested with Fugl-Meyer, mobility was assessed using the timed up & go test and gait measurements were performed with a portable GAITRite system®.

Results: There was a tendency of improvement on mobility and temporo-spatial parameters when using ankle-foot orthosis expressed by a timed up & go test decrease (43.00 to 39.77 s, p = 0.064), a speed improvement (32.10 to 42.00 cm/s, p = ns), a cadence increase (64.40 to 70.00 steps/ minute, p = ns), a cycle time decrease (1.86 to 1.71 s, p = ns) and a base of support decrease (14.67 to 14.55 cm, p = ns), although without significant difference. The positive difference in cadence with orthosis use had moderate correlation with a low Fugl-Meyer assessment lower extremity score (CC = -0.616). The positive difference in velocity with ankle-foot orthosis use had moderate correlation with its use before testing (CC = 0.600).

Conclusion: According to the present study, there is a tendency that supports the use of an ankle-foot orthosis to improve mobility, temporo-spatial parameters and gait symmetry. However, the impact of this orthosis was inconclusive, as these differences were not statically significant. It is known that small improvements in walking cadence may represent important functional benefits. Our research shows the use of an ankle-foot orthosis, namely the more impaired patients with lowest Fugl-Meyer lower extremity score, are those that benefit more. The correlation between the previous using of ankle-foot orthosis with a speed improvement seems to demonstrate the importance of training. There is a need for further well-designed randomized, controlled clinical trials, with larger samples, to establish better scientific evidence for walking effects related to ankle-foot orthosis wearing on stroke patients with equinus and/or varus foot.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Stein J, Brandstater ME. Stroke Rehabilitation. In: Frontera WR, DeLisa JA,

editors. Physical medicine and rehabilitation: principles and practice. 5th

ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2010. xxii, 2200, 39p.

Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic

review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:741-54. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-

Hendricks HT, van Limbeek J, Geurts AC, Zwarts MJ. Motor recovery after

stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.

;83:1629-37.

Ferreira LA, Neto HP, Grecco LA, Christovao TC, Duarte NA, Lazzari RD,

et al. Effect of ankle-foot orthosis on gait velocity and cadence of stroke

patients: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25:1503-8. doi:

1589/jpts.25.1503.

Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, Moreno JC, Pons JL,

Farina D, et al. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a topdown

approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8:66. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-

-66.

Tyson SF, Kent RM. Effects of an ankle-foot orthosis on balance and

walking after stroke: a systematic review and pooled meta-analysis. Arch

Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1377-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.025.

Tyson SF, Sadeghi-Demneh E, Nester CJ. A systematic review and metaanalysis

of the effect of an ankle-foot orthosis on gait biomechanics after

stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:879-91. doi: 10.1177/0269215513486497.

Guerra Padilla M, Molina Rueda F, Alguacil Diego IM. Effect of ankle-foot

orthosis on postural control after stroke: a systematic review. Neurologia.

;29:423-32. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2011.10.003.

Brincks J. 3D gait analysis of lower extremity muscle group power in

healthy subjects and subacute stroke patients, and task- specific gait

interventions in early stroke rehabilitation. [Dissertation - Faculty of Health

Sciences, Aarhus University]. Aarhus: FHS, AU; 2010.

Hennessey WJ. Lower Limb Orthotic Devices. In: Braddom RL, Chan L,

Harrast MA, editors. Physical medicine and rehabilitation. 4th ed.

Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2011. p. xxiv, 1506 p.

Esquenazi A, Talaty M. Gait Analysis: Technology and Clinical Applications.

In: Braddom RL, Chan L, Harrast MA, editors. Physical medicine and

rehabilitation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders/Elsevier; 2011. p. xxiv, 1506

p.

Pease WS, Bowyer BL. Human Walking. In: Frontera WR, DeLisa JA,

editors. Physical medicine and rehabilitation: principles and practice. 5th

ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health; 2010. xxii, 2200, 39

p.

Esquenazi A, Ofluoglu D, Hirai B, Kim S. The effect of an ankle-foot orthosis

on temporal spatial parameters and asymmetry of gait in hemiparetic

patients. PM R. 2009;1:1014-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.09.012.

Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association

with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with

chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1641-7. doi: 10.1016/

j.apmr.2005.01.011

Clinical Practice Guideline for the Assessment and Prevention of Falls in

Older People. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence:

Guidance. London: NICE; 2004.

Havertown P. GAITRite Operating Manual. MAP/CIR INC; 2007.

Burn J, Dennis M, Bamford J, Sandercock P, Wade D, Warlow C. Longterm

risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke. The Oxfordshire

Community Stroke Project. Stroke. 1994;25:333-7.

Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke

hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance.

Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7:13-31.

Banks JL, Marotta CA. Outcomes validity and reliability of the modified

Rankin scale: implications for stroke clinical trials: a literature review and

synthesis. Stroke. 2007;38:1091-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000258355.

c6

de Wit DC, Buurke JH, Nijlant JM, Ijzerman MJ, Hermens HJ. The effect of

an ankle-foot orthosis on walking ability in chronic stroke patients: a

randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:550-7. doi: 10.1191/

cr770oa

Published

2018-10-13

How to Cite

1.
Ferreira AM, Pires J, Carvalho F, Pereira A, Campos I, Laíns J. Effects of an Ankle-Foot Orthosis on Walking and Mobility After Stroke: a Clinical Trial. SPMFR [Internet]. 2018 Oct. 13 [cited 2024 Dec. 27];30(2):46-53. Available from: https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/240

Issue

Section

Original Article

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.