Digital Versus Classic Goniometry in Shoulder Motion Evaluation: An Agreement Pilot Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.253Keywords:
Arthrometry, Articular, Shoulder, Patient Positioning, Range of MotionAbstract
Introduction: Shoulder range of motion measurement is not only of diagnostic significance but is also relevant for monitoring response to therapeutic interventions. Smartphones incorporate accelerometers which enable easy multiaxial and multiangle measurements but their reliability compared to the classic goniometer remains to be established. The authors aim to ascertain the intra-rater reliability between manual and smartphone-based digital goniometry in measuring active flexion and external rotation in both standing and supine positions.
Methods: A convenience sample of 16 healthy volunteers was selected. Measures were taken by an independent rater at two different times, a week apart. We randomized both participant’s order and measurement sequence. The rater was trained according to a predetermined measurement protocol and blinded to intermediate measurements. We evaluated agreement between methods using the intraclass correlation coefficient, visual inspection of Bland-Altman plots and calculation of the limits of agreement.
Results: The intra-rater correlation was good regarding the external rotation-standing intraclass correlation coefficient 0.87 (IC 95%: 0.66-0.95), the external rotation-supine intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92 (IC 95%: 0.80-0.97)) and the active flexion standing intraclass correlation coefficient 0.92 (IC 95%: 0.78-0.97). The score was lower in the active flexion supine intraclass correlation coefficient 0.81 (IC 95%: 0.55-0.93).
Conclusion: There was a good intra-rater reliability between classic and digital goniometer in external rotation (regardless of positioning) and in standing active flexion. The smartphone based digital goniometer might be an easy tool to assist physical examination in healthy individuals, but its accuracy and applicability to clinical settings needs further evaluation.
Downloads
References
Pinto-Carral A, Fernández Villa T, Molina de la Torre A. Patient reported
mobility: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 ;97:1182-94.
Schultz J. Clinical evaluation of the shoulder. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N
Am. 2004;15:351-71.
Hayes K, Walton J, Szomor Z, Murrell G. Reliability of five methods for
assessing shoulder range of motion. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47:289-94.
Kolber M, Hanney W. The reliability and concurrent validity of shoulder
mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer: a
technical report. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012;7: 306-13.
Hirschhorn A, Lockhart J, Breckenridge J. Can a physical activity monitor
provide a valid measure of arm elevation angle? A study to assess
agreement between the SenseWear Mini Armband and the universal
goniometer. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;3;16:46.
Kumar Y, Yen S, Tay A, Lee W, Gao F, Zhao Z, et al. Wireless wearable rangeof-
motion sensor system for upper and lower extremity joints: a validation
study. Health Technol Lett. 2015;2:12-7.
Carey MA, Laird DE, Murray KA, Stevenson JR. Reliability, validity, and
clinical usability of a digital goniometer. Work. 2010;36:55-66
Mitchell K, Gutierrez SB, Sutton S, Morton S, Morgenthaler A. Reliability
and validity of goniometric iPhone applications for the assessment of
active shoulder external rotation. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30:521-5.
Mourcou Q, Fleury A, Diot B, Franco C, Vuillerme N. Mobile phone-based
joint angle measurement for functional assessment and rehabilitation of
proprioception. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:328142.
Werner BC, Holzgrefe RE, Griffin JW, Lyons ML, Cosgrove CT, Hart JM, et al.
Validation of an innovative method of shoulder range-of-motion
measurement using a smartphone clinometer application. J Shoulder
Elbow Surg. 2014;23:e275-82.
Johnson LB, Sumner S, Duong T, Yan P, Bajcsy R, Abresch RT, et al. Validity
and reliability of smartphone magnetometer-based goniometer
evaluation of shoulder abduction - A pilot study. Man Ther. 2015;20:777-82.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement
between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-10.
Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an
illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:187-99.
Bartko JJ. Measures of agreement: a single procedure. Stat Med.
;13:737-45.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright statement
Authors must also submit a copyright statement (as seen below) on article submission.
To the Editor-in-chief of the SPMFR Journal:
The below signed author(s) hereby state that the article
________________________________________ (ref. MFR_________) is
an original unpublished work and all facts stated are a product of the author(s) investigation. This article does not violate any copyright laws or privacy statements. The author(s) also hereby confirm that there is no conflict of interest's issues in this article.
By submitting this article the author(s) agree that after publication all copyrights belong to the SPMFR Journal.
Signed by all authors
Date:
Names (capital letters):
Signatures:
The SPMFR Journal’s contents are follow a Creative Commons licence. After publication the authors can hand out the articles as long as the SPMFR Journal is credited.
