Intra and Interrater Agreement Between Different Measurement Methods of Thigh Circumference

Authors

  • Rui Cadilha Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de S. João, Porto, Portugal
  • Hugo Amorim Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de S. João, Porto, Portugal
  • José Santoalha Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de S. João, Porto, Portugal
  • Afonso Rocha Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de S. João, Porto, Portugal
  • Fernando Parada Serviço de Medicina Física e de Reabilitação, Hospital de S. João, Porto, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.251

Keywords:

Anthropometry, Thigh

Abstract

Introduction: Evaluate the intra- and interrater reliability in the thigh circumference measurement using different anatomical references.

Material and Methods: Twenty five volunteers without history of pathology or surgery in the dominant leg entered in the study. The measurements were performed by two independent evaluators, on two occasions with an interval of one week. The measurements and participants order were randomized. The results of the interim measures were concealed, being analyzed by a third investigator. The assessment protocol was previously defined. The intra- and inter-rater correlation was measured through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The limits of agreement were established in accordance with the method of Bland and Altman.

Results: The intraclass agreement in intrarater reproducibility was high (SPPICC 0.96, KJLICC 0.95, ASISICC 0.96). In the interrater results the limits of agreement were: SPPICC 0.91 (IC 95%: 0.79–0.96), KJLICC 0.94 (IC 95%: 0.86–0.97), ASISICC 0,90 (IC 95%: 0.77–0.95).

Conclusion: All methods presented high intra- and interrater reliability, which by the simplicity of the measurement method may favor the choice for upper pole of the patella in the absence of pathology in anatomical segment evaluated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Brunkhorst L, Kielstein H. Comparison of anthropometric characteristics

between professional triathletes and cyclists. Biol Sport. 2013;30:269-73.

Knechtle B. Relationship of anthropometric and training characteristics

with race performance in endurance and ultra-endurance athletes. Asian

J Sports Med. 2014;5:73-90.

Friedrich M, Rust CA, Rosemann T, Knechtle P, Barandun U, Lepers R, et

al. A Comparison of Anthropometric and Training Characteristics

between Female and Male Half-Marathoners and the Relationship to

Race Time. Asian J Sports Med. 2014;5:10-20.

Al-Gindan YY, Hankey CR, Leslie W, Govan L, Lean ME. Predicting muscle

mass from anthropometry using magnetic resonance imaging as

reference: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2014;72:113-126.

Mathur S, Takai KP, Macintyre DL, Reid D. Estimation of thigh muscle

mass with magnetic resonance imaging in older adults and people with

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Phys Ther. 2008;88:219-30.

Ross M, Worrell TW. Thigh and calf girth following knee injury and

surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:9-15.

Laupattarakasem W, Paholpak P, Kosuwon W. The relevant level to

estimate girth difference between thighs after anterior cruciate ligament

deficiency. J Med Assoc Thai. 2012;95 Suppl 10:S178-83.

Allison SC, Westphal KA, Finstuen K. Knee extension and flexion torque

as a function of thigh asymmetry. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18:661-

Nicolakis P, Nicolakis M, Dorotka R, Ebenbichler G, Uher E. Beurteilung

des Rehabilitationsfortschritts mittels Oberschenkelumfangmessung. Z

Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2000;138:526-9.

Soderberg GL, Ballantyne BT, Kestel LL. Reliabiity of lower extremity girth

measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Physiother Res Int. 1996;1:7-16.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement

between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.

Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an

illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:187-

Bartko JJ. Measures of agreement: a single procedure. Stat Med

;13:737-45.

Zou GY. Sample size formulas for estimating intraclass correlation

coefficients with precision and assurance. Stat Med. 2012;31:3972-81.

Maylia E FJ, Nokes LD, Jones MD. Can thigh girth be measured

accurately? a preliminary investigation. J Sport Rehabil. 1999:43-9.

Downloads

How to Cite

1.
Cadilha R, Amorim H, Santoalha J, Rocha A, Parada F. Intra and Interrater Agreement Between Different Measurement Methods of Thigh Circumference. SPMFR [Internet]. 2017 Aug. 5 [cited 2024 Nov. 21];29(1):16-21. Available from: https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/251

Issue

Section

Original Article