Success in Pain Management Associated with Spasticity in Stroke Measured by Goal Attainment Scaling

Authors

  • Mónica Bettencourt Dias Centro de Medicina e Reabilitação de Alcoitão
  • Daniela Pinto Centro de Medicina e Reabilitação de Alcoitão
  • Sara Paradinha Centro de Medicina e Reabilitação de Alcoitão
  • Luís Gonçalves Centro de Medicina e Reabilitação de Alcoitão
  • Jorge Jacinto Centro de Medicina e Reabilitação de Alcoitão

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25759/spmfr.261

Keywords:

Botulinum Toxins, Type A, Muscle Spasticity, Pain Management, Pain Measurement, Stroke/complications

Abstract

Introduction: The pain associated with spasticity after stroke is common and interfere with the functionality and quality of life, and their treatment is not easy in some cases. Currently botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) has an alternative to established treatments, so the authors aims to evaluate the success of their treatment in pain in patients with stroke sequelae, measured by goal attainment scaling.

Material and Methods: Prospective, non-interventional study. Cohort of 82 cases treated between 01/03/09 and 31/10/12. Included patients aged 18 to 85 years with a diagnosis of stroke, in which pain was a target for treatment. The scales used were the numerical pain scale and Likert scale. The measuring success was made with goal attainment scaling. The treatment met the characteristics and expectations of each case. The results were analyzed with parametric tests and non-parametric tests.

Results and Discussion: Sample of 37 men and 39 women with a mean age of 59 years. The pain affected more the upper limb (77.6%), and was most frequent in shoulder (49%). The numerical pain scale was used in 53 cases and the mean value before and after treatment was 7/10 and 3/10 respectively. In 49 (92%) patients, the decreased amount of one or more degrees in numerical pain scale. The difference was significant (p < 0.001). The Likert scale was used in 23 cases. After treatment 20 (87%) were “better” or “much better”. This result was significant (p < 0.001). The end goal attainment scaling score was 52 and its variation was 12 on average. In 61 (80%) cases this was clinically significant (≥ 10). The difference between initial and final scores was statistically significant (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The goal attainment scaling was a valid instrument, which resulted in the successful delivery of objectives centered on the patient and their quality of life, and had good correlation with the results of standardized scales, used to measure the clinical results in the treatment of pain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zaza C, Stolee P, Prkachin K, Psych R. the application of goal attainment

scaling in chronic pain settings. Pain Symptom Manage. 1999; 17:55-64.

Harrison R, Field T. Post-stroke pain: Identification, assessment and

therapy. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015; 39: 190-201. doi: 10.1159/000375397.

O`Donnell M, Diener H, Sacco RL, Panju AA, Vinisko R, Yusuf S, et al.

Chronic pain syndromes after isquemic stroke PRoFESS trial. Stroke. 2013;

:1238-43. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.671008.

Watkins CL, Leathley MJ, Gregson JM, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK.

Prevalence of spasticity post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16: 515-22.

Turner-Stokes L, Fheodoroff K, Jacinto J, Maisonobe P, Zakine B. Upper

limb international spasticity study: rationale and protocol for a large,

international, multicenter prospective cohort study investigating

management and goal attainment following treatment with botulinum

toxin A in real-life clinical practice. BMJ Open. 2013; 3. pii: e002230.

doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002230.

Lance JW. Symposium synopsis. In: Feldman RG, Young RR, Koella WP,

editors. Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control. Chicago: Year Book Medical

Publishers; 1980.p. 485-94.

Intiso D. Therapeutic use of botulinum toxin in neuro rehabilitation. J

Toxicol. 2012;2012:802893. doi: 10.1155/2012/802893

Bakheit AM, Fedorova NV, Skoromets AA, Timerbaeva SL, Bhakta BB,

Coxon L. The beneficial antispasticity effect of botulinum toxin type is

maintained after repeated treatment cycles. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiary.

; 75: 1558-61.

Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling in rehabilitation; a practical guide.

Clin Rehabil. 2009; 23:362–70.

Kiresuk T, Sherman R. Goal attainment scaling: a general method of

evaluating comprehensive mental health programmes. Community Ment

Health J. 1968; 4:443–53.

Pavone F, Luvisetto F. Botulinum neurotoxin for pain management:

insights from animal models. Toxins. 2010; 2: 2890-913. doi: 10.3390/toxins

Wissel J, Schelosky L, Scott J, Christe W, Faiss JH, Mueller J. Early

development of spasticity following stroke: a prospective, observational

trial. J Neurol. 2010; 257:1067-72. doi: 10.1007/s00415-010-5463-1.

Bakheit M, Zakine B, Maisonobe P, Aymard C, Fhedoroff K, Hefter H, et al.

The profile of patients and current practice of treatment of upper limb

muscle spasticity with botulinum toxin type A: an international survey. Int

J Rehabil Res. 2010; 33:199-204. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328332f5e0.

Fheodoroff K, Ashford S, Jacinto J, Maisanobe P, Balcaitiene J, Turner-

Stokes L. Factors influencing Goal Attainment in patients with post-stroke

upper limb spasticity following treatment with botulinum toxin A in real-life

clinical practice: sub-analyses from the upper limb international spasticity

(ULIS) – II Study. Toxins., 2015; 7:1192-1205. doi: 10.3390/toxins7041192.

Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling: a commentary. J Rehabil Med.

; 43: 70–2.

Turner-Stokes L, Baguley I, Graaff S, Katrak P, Davies L, McCrory P, et al.

Goal Attainment Scaling in the evaluation of treatment of upper limb

spasticity with botulinum toxin: a secondary analysis from a double-blind

placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42: 81–

doi: 10.2340/16501977-0474.

Published

2018-10-13

How to Cite

1.
Bettencourt Dias M, Pinto D, Paradinha S, Gonçalves L, Jacinto J. Success in Pain Management Associated with Spasticity in Stroke Measured by Goal Attainment Scaling. SPMFR [Internet]. 2018 Oct. 13 [cited 2024 Nov. 24];30(2):54-9. Available from: https://spmfrjournal.org/index.php/spmfr/article/view/261

Issue

Section

Original Article

Similar Articles

<< < 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.